Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 22496 articles
Browse latest View live

*** ERROR *** ABOVE LINE CONTAINS ERRONEOUS DATA.

$
0
0

I am new to STAAD and I don't particularly understand the required syntax. Maybe I do not have the order of operations correct or maybe something is missing.

I am trying to run a lifting analysis on a skid for a pressure vessel. I am in a time crunch and need to get this working ASAP. I have started working in steps on my way to a good final analysis. At this point I want to simply solve the analysis and check results for CoG. I am currently getting an ERROR that appears to be with a load, though I do not understand it since my loads have all been defined and attached to members.

If someone could help me out that would be greatly appreciated!

 communities.bentley.com/.../GDP-Horizontal-Slug-Catcher-ZZZ_2D00_101.STD


Can you manually change the Material Properties Used in RAM SBeam for Modulus of Elasticity

$
0
0

Can i manually change the modulus of elasticity used in Ram steel? The client wants us to use E based on the Euro code but design is based on IBC/AISC codes. 

Story drift command and ASCE 12.8.60

$
0
0

My question is: 

After considering Sory DRIFT CHECK: CD/I (EQ4) then PRINT STORY DRIFT 0.020000

i can find that staad make a check  by using the average displacement at each floor and compare it to the allowable. and this is not matching w/  ASCE 7-16-12.8.60 for the 2nd floor and above.

As per code to check Drift for second-story by using CD/I , shall consider the difference between displacement at 1st floor and the displacement on the second floor then compare it w/ the allowable.

pls specify?

learn bently.com calrification for P-delta Stabailty coefficent (VIDEO 2)

$
0
0

My question is :

in Video 2 : Generating Seismic Loads MRS Procedure>>>when starts to calculate the stability coefficient at each level, the below equations are mentioned  and 

I can't find the exact location from the output results for  the underlined values by red as below photo.) . So pls advise the calculation reference for theses values. 

OpenStaad GetResultantForceAlongLineForPlateList function to returns forces and moments along the cut line for a particular load case in plates

$
0
0

I have 3 issues with trying to use the GetResultantForceAlongLineForPlateList function that I suppose are probably the cause I can't retrieve yet the resultant forces along a line of cut plates thus

any example, supplementary data or help would be truly appreciated (RetVal is always returning FALSE thus all retrieved values in "forces" vector are zero).

1.- The manual for openstaad reads the following to call this function (7 parameters)

VARIANT OSOutputUI::GetResultantForceAlongLineForPlateList(VARIANT FAR & plateList,
const VARIANT FAR & nplates,
VARIANT FAR & loadIdList,
VARIANT FAR & startNode,
VARIANT FAR & endNode,
const VARIANT FAR & isTransformForceToGlobal,
VARIANT FAR & resultantForces 
)

but in the description below it refers to another parameter "facingnode" that I don't know how to pass of if it is not needed at all (i called the function with 8 parameters just for a test and it gave me an error)

Returns forces and moments along the cut line for a particular load case.

Parameters
[in]plateListList of plates IDs. a) All plates in model, b) plates through which the cut line crosses (both would work but 'a' is computationally expensive)
[in]nplatesNo of plates in plateList
[in]loadIdthe load case for plate analysis
[in]startNodex, y, z values of the start node at indexes 0, 1 and 2. API always expects an array size of 3.
[in]endNodex, y, z values of the end node at indexes 0, 1 and 2. API always expects an array size of 3.
[in]facingNodex, y, z values of the facing node at indexes 0, 1 and 2. API always expects an array size of 3. Definition of facingNode: It is the node which sits on the tip of a vector which is orthogonal to the vector startNode -> endNode and lies in the same plane as that of the plates through which the cut line passes.
[in]isTransformForceToGlobal1: return force in Global System 0: return forces in local system of cut line
[out]resultantForcesFx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz at array indexes 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

2.- the example provided in the manual calls for another function instead GetResultantForceAlongLineForParametricSurface

Dim objOpenStaad As Object

Dim stdFile As String
Dim RetVal As Variant
Dim surfaceName As String
Dim loadId As Long
Dim startNode(2) As Double
Dim endNode(2) As Double
Dim forces(5) As Double
Dim transformToGlobal As Long
Dim fx,fy,fz,mx,my,mz As Double
Set objOpenStaad = GetObject(,"StaadPro.OpenSTAAD")
objOpenStaad.GetSTAADFile stdFile, "TRUE"
If stdFile="" Then
MsgBox"Bad"
Set objOpenStaad = Nothing
Exit Sub
End If
surfaceName = "WALL 1 "
loadId = 1
startNode(0) = 0
startNode(1) = 15
startNode(2) = 0
endNode(0) = 0
endNode(1) = 54
endNode(2) = 60
transformToGlobal = 1
RetVal = objOpenStaad.Output.GetResultantForceAlongLineForParametricSurface(surfaceName, loadId, startNode, endNode, transformToGlobal, forces)
fx = forces(0)
fy = forces(1)
fz = forces(2)
mx = forces(3)
my = forces(4)
mz = forces(5)

3.- I'm not sure what is the format required for the list of plates to be provided in the string parameter plateList; ¿space or blank or comma between values?

The sub I'm using is this so far -not working-; the coordinates of the nodes are in my model in the ends of a line that crosses 10 plates

Sub OpenSTAADresultantes()

Dim objOpenStaad As Object
Dim stdFile As String
Dim RetVal As Variant
Dim numerodeplacas As Variant
Dim surfaceName As String
Dim loadId As Long
Dim startNode(2) As Double
Dim endNode(2) As Double
Dim FacingNode(2) As Double
Dim forces(5) As Double
Dim transformToGlobal As Long
Dim fx, fy, fz, mx, my, mz As Double
Set objOpenStaad = GetObject(, "StaadPro.OpenSTAAD")
objOpenStaad.GetSTAADFile stdFile, "TRUE"
If stdFile = "" Then
MsgBox "Bad"
Set objOpenStaad = Nothing
Exit Sub
End If


'surfaceName = "110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290"
surfaceName = "110,130,150,170,190,210,230,250,270,290"
numerodeplacas = 10
loadId = 1
startNode(0) = 4.75
startNode(1) = 0
startNode(2) = 0
endNode(0) = 4.75
endNode(1) = 0
endNode(2) = 5
FacingNode(0) = 4.75 'NOTA en la ayuda pide este punto pero no está en los argumentos
FacingNode(1) = 5
FacingNode(2) = 5
'1: return force in Global System 0: return forces in local system of cut line
transformToGlobal = 1
RetVal = objOpenStaad.Output.GetResultantForceAlongLineForPlateList(surfaceName, numerodeplacas, loadId, startNode, endNode, transformToGlobal, forces)
'RetVal = objOpenStaad.Output.GetResultantForceAlongLineForPlateList(surfaceName, numerodeplacas, loadId, startNode, endNode, FacingNode, transformToGlobal, forces)

fx = forces(0)
fy = forces(1)
fz = forces(2)
mx = forces(3)
my = forces(4)
mz = forces(5)
MsgBox fz
MsgBox mx
End Sub

Dynamic -spectrum analysis-scale factors for fundamental period , how i can calculate ?

$
0
0

AS per  Video GeneratingSesimicLoadsMRSProcedureTRNC03540, checks for scale factors considered for base shear only and not the fundamental period. 

My question is: How I can consider this check as per clause 12.9.1.4.1 in staad pro connect. 

Regarding Staad foundation adv

Plate analysis results - Global Moments

$
0
0

Hi there,

While interpreting global moment results for plate analysis, what the does the result direction means ? I am aware that the 'up' parameter is the axis towards which the local axis of the plate points. I have a little confusion about whether the result direction means about the axis or parallel to the axis (see snippet below). I would appreciate some guidance on this. 

Thanks

Shivam


How to convert local axis forces and moment into global axis forces and moment?

$
0
0

Morning, 

Inside the StaadPro, the forces and moments generated are in the member local axis. Means the forces and moments do not abide by the global axis direction. (pls correct if I am wrong with this concept)

What if I have a horizontal and a inclined member which connecting together at a node/point? 

Q1. Does StaadPro can convert the forces and moments generated in inclined members to global axis direction?

Q2. Any method/theory to convert moments generated in local axis if I have to convert it into global axis moment?

Example,

Result generated by StaadPro.

Horizontal member - (Fx-10kN, Fy-20kN, My-10kNm, Mz-20kNm)

Inclined member(with 45 degree) - (Fx-4kN, Fy-8kN, My-4kNm, Mz-8kNm)

Q3. How to find the resultant forces/moments from a horizontal and inclined member acting on a point?

tqvm.

I have designed a solar module mounting structure. After defining LY and LZ for rafter member, the actual utility ratio becomes zero? Why does this happen? what is the criteria to assign LY and LZ ? I am attaching the STAAD file below. Please guide

Spectral analysis considering masses induced by moving loads in a certain position.

$
0
0

Hello everyone,

In my didactic model I have to design a mat foundation for a locomotive repairs channel. I have generated some moving loads and next I 've created loads for most significant position of moving loads.

My issue is : the locomotives are staying in the repair position (in the center of channel) for more than 1 month (let's say worst case scenario) and I have to consider in my load combination for the design the seismic forces induced by locomotive mass. Can someone help me how to define the masses for the seismic spectral analysis. I tried to define the masses( all self weight loads in X,Y,Z,and for locomotive in repair position for Y component a repeated load , and National loads for X and Z with 1 coefficient), to set all parameters required in the spectral analysis tab but when I had run the model  for the specific seismic load combination I had no results...

Thank you and look forward for your advice.

Warning : DIAPHRAGM# COVERS A WIDE RANGE BETWEEN 4.613 METE AND 4.973 METE. FLOOR HEIGHT LOCATION MAY NOT BE CORRECT.

$
0
0

I have a sloped deck in Z direction a. I considered one floor DIA with a Wide range  in Y {DIA 4 TYPE RIG YR 4.613 4.973}  So can I ignore this warning or I have  to fix and how?

RAM Connection Brace Angle Override

$
0
0

It would be nice if the integrated RAM Connection would allow a permanent override of brace angle on CBB and CVR connections.  RAM SS designs to an analytical line at the top of the beams, and we design braced frame connections to the centerline.  the result is that the brace angle is off by over a degree at times and the gusset geometry can be affected significantly.  Currently i name my connection in the module by the true angle so i don't have to re measure every time, then temporarily override the brace angle in the connection pad, but it would be really nice if that override held so we didn't have to jump through so many hoops.  I suppose this should go over to the feature request thingy, but thought I'd place my gripe here as well to see if there was any feedback.

cheers.

How to define twin wall precast concrete elements

$
0
0

Hi there, 

Which is the best way to define a cross section that comprises of 2 twin walls of precast concrete + concrete cast in situ + insolation panels . The panels have lattice girders ( typical from the Omnia system ) . Thank you very much in advancecommunities.bentley.com/.../pic1.pdf

RAM Structural System: Wind Loads

$
0
0

I know RAM only analyzes wind loads in the +X and +Y directions unless the "Generate Additional Load Cases with Tension-Only Members" box is checked in the load cases dialogue window. I have a 2-story moment frame project and I am trying to determine the implications of not checking the box to analyze the structure for wind in both directions.

Is it problematic to only consider wind in the +X and +Y directions since the columns from one end of a frame to the other will have different member force and reaction envelopes? Why wouldn't you always check the box to create the additional -X and -Y wind load cases?

I also have some nodal wind loads I need to add. I was going to create custom load combinations for these but there are 144 load combinations with wind so I would need to edit all of those to add in the nodal load in one direction and then duplicate them and change the signs to create the same load combinations but with wind in the opposite direction.

I was hoping to use the merge load cases function to combine the nodal loads with the wind loads to avoid creating all the custom load combinations but I don't think that is possible if I need to analyze loads in the +X/+Y and -X/-Y directions.  


RAM SS Steel Gravity Beam Controlling Moment doesn't match pre-composite or post-composite

$
0
0

Hi everyone,

For one of the gravity beams in our project, I saw that the controlling moment does not match either the pre-composite or the post-composite moment (both demand and capacity are different). I am trying to understand why this would be happening. Can anyone throw some light on this? Does RAM check any other condition (other than pre-composite and post-composite)?

Thanks,
Elesh.

communities.bentley.com/.../5415.VPECTRL3-_2D00_-RAM-Steel-_2D00_-Gravity-Beam-Design.pdf

**ERROR: SUPPORT OR SPRING IN SLAVE DIRECTION

Lifting Analysis

$
0
0

Good afternoon,

I believe that I have my model set up how I want it with offsets, sections, properties, loading, code checking and design. BUT I do have a few questions:

1. There will be a vessel on the skid steel frame. (Looking at an example that came from a 3rd party engineering firm it appears that they input the vessel "with rigid elements as a simple beam span located at approximate vessel CG height with laterally braced rigid element supports at each end.") 

          1.a. Would it be recommended to take credit for the rigidity of the vessel?

          1.b. Should the vessel be modeled as rigid elements with no defined section? Should it be modeled as a piece of pipe or hollow cylinder?

2. Looking at the design results (Utilization ratio) there are 2 angle's that are very similar, 1 is failing and the other is passing. The passing one is actually loaded unlike the failing one. What is actually happening here and how do I fix it?

3. Looking at the 3rd party engineering design on our last skid they accounted for the full length of the main runners on the sides (long beams). My model automatically split the beams when I imported the sketch. Should I be examining each of the beam segments individually or as a whole? (ex. 35, 36, 37 could be a single beam; 32, 31, 30 could be a single beam) Should I be preventing the breaking of my beams into smaller segments both for main runners and cross members?

4. Are my FIXED BUT supports correct? The intent of the simulation is to model what would happen if the skid was picked up by a crane using a spreader bar and moved to its permanent location on site and ensure that it is AISC 360-16 Code compliant.

If you have any questions for me please ask and I will answer to the best of my ability.

communities.bentley.com/.../2210.GDP-Horizontal-Slug-Catcher-ZZZ_2D00_101_5F00_rev1.STD

Analysis result checking

$
0
0

Hi,

    For the first time, I tried to run the model for the student assignment with STAAD pro. I am not really sure my results are correct. I tried to solve the errors but there are still some warnings and messages like.

***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY

NOTE: CONCRETE QUANTITY REPRESENTS VOLUME OF CONCRETE IN BEAMS, COLUMNS, AND PLATES DESIGNED ABOVE.

*** NOTE: If any floor diaphragm is present in the model Wind Load definition

**NOTE** about Floor/OneWay Loads/Weights. 

** NOTE ** A DENSITY OF MORE THAN 10 TIMES THAT OF STEEL ENTERED. PLEASE CHECK.

**NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS

***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 194 DIRECTION = MZ

**WARNING- THIS STRUCTURE IS DISJOINTED. IGNORE IF

And I don't know how to check result 

****TORSION VALUE TOO HIGH. INCREASE MEMBER SIZE. 

***COLUMN SIZE IS INADEQUATE TO CARRY EVEN THE AXIAL LOAD 

it keeps saying to increase my memberscommunities.bentley.com/.../All-stl.STD

(I have to generate BMD and SFD for my friends for hand checking and

also have to design footing and generate structural drawing(can suggest anything for that too?))

communities.bentley.com/.../All-stl.STD

Moment Capacity check in STAAD Foundation

$
0
0

Dear Sir,

For a raft of 500mm thick with 16Dia@200mm Bot. & Top RFT, the section moment capacity according to ACI-318-14 is around 153 KN-m/m.

In Staad FDN Moment capacity check, it gives a higher value of 236 KN-m/m according to the below snapshot.

Please advise how this value is calculated by Staad FDN.

Best regards,

Atef

Viewing all 22496 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>